Dear Bushra Khan,
By own experience, I really think that hospital at home must play a main role in this crisis. To avoid collapse, hospitals need discharge patients in a early way and avoid admissions. But many times, patients are frail, are suffering for respiratory failure, feel unsure, if not scared to return home, and have to be monitoring in order to check a complete recovering. Some patients have fever after discharge, some have dysnea for days or even weeks, some need to be monitored for comorbidities, some are coinfected and need specific treatment.... For all these patients, hospital at home can cover most of their needs.
For the Emergency Department, we have defined criteria to avoid admission. These are patient <60 years, with lung envolvement, without risk factors (uncontrolled hypertension/diabetes, obesity, inmunosupression, severe lung diseases, heart diseases), and some laboratory criteria.
Most patients feel more confortable and sure when hospital is monitoring the disease at home, and I don't have any doubt that many readmissions are avoided.
Manuel - Hospital at Home Unit. Torrejón Hospital. Madrid. Spain